2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (222 HP @ 6150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Mondeo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mondeo | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mondeo | C70 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |