2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (222 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Mondeo has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Mondeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mondeo | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Ford | Daewoo |
Model | Mondeo | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |