2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mondeo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 26 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Mondeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mondeo | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Mondeo | Countryman |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.5 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 47 L |