2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. (194 HP @ 8000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mustang | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Mustang | A6GCM |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
