2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Lamborghini Marzal
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lamborghini Marzal would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. (175 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 450 kg more than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. (179 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mustang | 1967 Lamborghini Marzal | |
Make | Ford | Lamborghini |
Model | Mustang | Marzal |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 62 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |