2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1984 Skoda L
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1984 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 654 kg more than 1984 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mustang | 1984 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Mustang | L |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |
