2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mustang | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Mustang | 4000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |