2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1987 Zastava 750

To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1987 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1987 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava 750. (56 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: