2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 98 kg more than 2002 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mustang | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
