2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mustang | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |