2002 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 772 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mustang | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | Minica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2350 mm |
