2002 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 251 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mustang | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Cruze |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2685 mm |