2002 Ford Puma vs. 1948 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 100 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1065 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.
Because 1948 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1948 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | Puma | Pullman |
Year Released | 2002 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 4086 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 120 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 6.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3330 mm |