2002 Ford Puma vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Minica. (33 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 565 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Minica. (39 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1973 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Puma | Minica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 39 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |