2002 Ford Puma vs. 1978 Lada 1600
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lada 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lada 1600 would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lada 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1978 Lada 1600. (78 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1978 Lada 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 5 kg more than 1978 Lada 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Lada 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lada 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Lada 1600. (122 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Lada 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Puma | 1978 Lada 1600 | |
| Make | Ford | Lada |
| Model | Puma | 1600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 39 L |
