2002 Ford Puma vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 225 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Puma | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | Colt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2310 mm |
