2002 Ford Puma vs. 1979 Renault 15
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 15 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1979 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1979 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 70 kg more than 1979 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Puma | 1979 Renault 15 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Puma | 15 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 69 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |
