2002 Ford Puma vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 435 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Puma | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2730 mm |
