2002 Ford Puma vs. 1993 Seat Ibiza
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Seat Ibiza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Seat Ibiza would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Seat Ibiza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Seat Ibiza (156 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Seat Ibiza should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 5 kg more than 1993 Seat Ibiza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Seat Ibiza (210 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 1993 Seat Ibiza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1993 Seat Ibiza | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Puma | Ibiza |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |