2002 Ford Puma vs. 1994 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1994 Suzuki Swift. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1994 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 205 kg more than 1994 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1994 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Puma | Swift |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1590 mm |