2002 Ford Puma vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Puma | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2270 mm |