2002 Ford Puma vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Puma weights approximately 339 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Puma | Mini |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |