2002 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Skoda Octavia. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2000 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Skoda Octavia. (134 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Skoda Octavia.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Puma 2000 Skoda Octavia
Make Ford Skoda
Model Puma Octavia
Year Released 2002 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1560 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 1215 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2520 mm