2002 Ford Puma vs. 2003 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra CL weights approximately 267 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.
Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 2003 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Puma | CL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |