2002 Ford Puma vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Puma | E-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 132 L |