2002 Ford Puma vs. 2007 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2007 Mini Cooper is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. In terms of performance, 2007 Mini Cooper (173 HP @ 1600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mini Cooper (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Puma | 2007 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Puma | Cooper |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |