2002 Ford Puma vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (190 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Puma | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Puma | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |
