2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 70 kg more than 1954 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Talbot Baby. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | Ranger | Baby |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2693 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3130 mm |