2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Lotus 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ranger | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Ranger | 16 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2260 mm |
