2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ranger | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |
