2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1969 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 6,547 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Pontiac Firebird (330 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 120 kg more than 1969 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ranger | 1969 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ranger | Firebird |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6547 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 330 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |
