2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 810 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications: