2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 820 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | XJR |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 90 L |