2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Audi 4000
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1986 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 4000. 1986 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1986 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Ranger | 4000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |