2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 723 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2260 mm |