2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 570 kg more than 1991 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Nissan Pulsar. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1991 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 179 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2440 mm |