2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 975 kg more than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1995 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Ranger | Wagon |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2330 mm |