2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 515 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (185 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 185 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |