2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (178 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 295 kg more than 1998 Rover 75.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |