2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (257 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 181 kg more than 2005 Volvo S60.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | S60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1539 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |