2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 800 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Zastava 103. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.

Compare all specifications: