2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 GMC Yukon

To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (285 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Yukon weights approximately 715 kg more than 2002 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (400 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Ranger 2006 GMC Yukon
Make Ford GMC
Model Ranger Yukon
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2300 cc 4802 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 128 HP 285 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 207 Nm 400 Nm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 6 seats
Vehicle Weight 1720 kg 2435 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1950 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2950 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 98 L