2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 BMW 120
To start off, 2010 BMW 120 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 120 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 160 kg more than 2010 BMW 120.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 120 (300 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2010 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 2010 BMW 120 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Ranger | 120 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1411 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |