2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2011 Renault Trafic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2011 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Trafic.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Renault Trafic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Trafic (241 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2011 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ranger | 2011 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Trafic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 241 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 90 L |