2002 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 745 kg more than 2011 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Suzuki Equator. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ranger (207 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Equator. 2011 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Ranger 2011 Suzuki Equator
Make Ford Suzuki
Model Ranger Equator
Year Released 2002 2011
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2300 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 128 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 207 Nm 171 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1720 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]