2002 Ford Taurus vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Taurus weights approximately 717 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Taurus | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Taurus | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2933 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |
