2002 Ford Taurus vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Ford Taurus is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Taurus (153 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 103 kg more than 2002 Ford Taurus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Taurus | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Taurus | CL |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |