2002 Ford Taurus vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Taurus weights approximately 767 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2004 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Taurus | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Taurus | Minica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2350 mm |