2002 Ford Taurus vs. 2005 GMC Savana
To start off, 2005 GMC Savana is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Savana (195 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Ford Taurus. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 853 kg more than 2002 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Savana (353 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Taurus. (244 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Taurus | 2005 GMC Savana | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Taurus | Savana |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |