2002 Ford Taurus vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Taurus weights approximately 122 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6. 2002 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Taurus | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | 6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2933 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1477 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |